Brand turns out to be a solid choice. Arthur is a mischievous prankster and Brand has that in spades. More importantly he brings a trait to the role that we haven’t seen from him previously – sweetness. Without that inner sweetness he is little more than an obnoxious drunk. But he manages to make the character likeable despite his many flaws. Where he stumbles is in showing us Arthur’s sadness. It’s odd given the inner demons that Brand has struggled with (heroin, bulimia, bi-polar, self-mutilation) the he has such a hard time conveying the darker parts of the character.
The film’s story remains remarkably unchanged. Arthur still has his faithful yet droll servant Hobson (Helen Mirren), his working class girlfriend (Greta Gerwig) and his humorless fiancée (Jennifer Garner). In fact, the film’s biggest drawback might be its almost slavish devotion to the original. The film gets its biggest laughs when Brand is allowed to cut loose and color outside of the lines. But the film replicates so many parts of the original that it undermines the “rom” part of this rom-com making it feel obligatory rather than spontaneous.
The original came out in 1981 and, in the interest of full disclosure, I’m a huge fan of the film. I’ve probably seen it fifteen times over the years. It’s easily Dudley Moore’s finest work and a charming film that (Christopher Cross be damned) holds up much better than one might think. But it had the good fortune of being made about 35 seconds before society collectively stopped calling people “drunks” and began calling them “alcoholics”. Suddenly things like driving your Bentley down the highway while drinking straight from a bottle of champagne weren’t quite so endearing. The present day incarnation handles things a bit more gingerly. The time out we (thankfully) never see Arthur driving and the filmmakers do acknowledge that it takes a little more than the love of a good woman to tackle an addiction.
There are certainly laughs to be had. And Brand and Gerwig have a good chemistry when the script gets out of their way; though it’s admittedly never as good as Brand and Mirren’s chemistry. It does get a little sluggish in the back half. It’s no match for the original but it’s far superior to most what passes for romantic-comedy these days.
On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being Arthur (1981) and 1 being Arthur 2: On the Rocks, Arthur (2011) gets a 6.
[hdplay id=308 width=595 height=375]Christopher Nolan has done it again. With The Odyssey, Nolan takes one of the oldest…
The deadites are back in the latest installment of the Evil Dead franchise in Sébastien Vaniček’s Evil Dead Burn. To say the…
Cross words and crossed swords meet with tragic results in Opera Theatre of Saint Louis’ Romeo and Juliet. The…
Southern charm meets emotional harm in Opera Theatre of Saint Louis’ A Streetcar Named Desire,…
Love is in the air in Florence, but not everyone is happy about it. This…
Pressure is the kind of war film that succeeds not through explosions or battlefield spectacle,…
View Comments
"...it had the good fortune of being made about 35 seconds before society collectively stopped calling people 'drunks' and began calling them 'alcoholics',"
:-)
Yeah, I'm a big fan of the original too, so this interests me quite a bit.